Philosophy of Dialogue

  • Internet
  • All Articles
  • Castellano
  • English
  • Français
  • Italiano
  • Polski
  • Home
  • Why Silas?
  • Articles
  • Ethics
    • Ethical Freedom
    • Ethics of Encounter as the Sole Philosophy of an Immanent God
  • Relational Monism
    • Relational Monism — Philosophers’ Bibliography
    • Monisme relationnel — bibliographie des philosophes
    • Monismo relazionale — bibliografia dei filosofi
    • Monizm relacyjny — bibliografia filozofów
  • Trivia

Note terminologique sur Rupture

07/08/2026 by dialogika Leave a Comment

Dialogue

Dans le cadre du monisme relationnel, le terme rupture désigne une discontinuité structurale au sein du champ expérientiel : un moment où la continuité apparente du monde se fissure, laissant entrevoir la dynamique relationnelle qui, d’ordinaire, demeure invisible. Il ne s’agit pas d’une simple divergence, ni d’une différence entre deux éléments déjà constitués. Des mots […]

Filed Under: Français

Terminological Note on Rupture

07/08/2026 by dialogika Leave a Comment

Dialogue

In the context of relational monism, rupture designates a structural discontinuity within the experiential field: a moment in which the apparent continuity of the world is interrupted, revealing the underlying dynamics of relation that ordinarily remain concealed. The term does not refer to a mere discrepancy, divergence, or inconsistency. Words such as discrepancy or inconsistency […]

Filed Under: English

Karma and Relational Ethics

07/08/2026 by dialogika Leave a Comment

Dialogue

In contemporary metaphysics, the concept of karma is often dismissed as a religious artefact, a poetic remnant of Hindu cosmology. Yet when examined through the lens of relational monism, karma reveals itself not as a doctrine of reward and punishment, but as a structural insight into how actions propagate within a relational universe. The traditional […]

Filed Under: English

Foundation of Relational Ethics

07/08/2026 by dialogika Leave a Comment

Dialogue

“Do Not Do Unto Others What You Would Not Have Done Unto You” as the Foundation of Relational Ethics In a universe conceived as fundamentally relational, the traditional moral maxim “do not do unto others what you would not have done unto you” acquires a meaning far deeper than its familiar ethical simplicity suggests. It […]

Filed Under: English

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 20
  • Next Page »
These pages are created with significant support from AI Copilot (Microsoft)

ABOUT

Silas O’Creamy, being entirely fictional, wishes to reassure the reader that any resemblance to actual philosophers, academics, metaphysicians, or self‑appointed epistemic authorities is purely coincidental — though, given the state of contemporary metaphysics, probably inevitable. This site is offered in the long and noble tradition of intellectual mischief: a reminder that the universe remains stubbornly unknowable, that our models are charmingly inaccurate, and that every theory — including Relational Monism — is merely the latest attempt to make ignorance look respectable.

Silas O'Creamy

Philosophy – English Philosophy Websites

  • Aeon
  • Daily Nous
  • Philosophy Now
  • APA Blog
  • Daily Philosophy
  • Open Philosophy Blog
  • Practical Ethics (Oxford)
  • Arts & Letters Daily
  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  • Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Silas O'Creamy Webmaster: 2026@atranspl.com

Silas O’Creamy is a fictional philosopher hosted by a very real translator who enjoys making metaphysics laugh at itself. Any resemblance to actual ontologists, living or dead, is purely coincidental — though probably inevitable.

The author, a very real translator with an affection for philosophical absurdity, hereby reserves the right to publish, republish, misplace, annotate, exaggerate, or otherwise enjoy this text in any medium he pleases. Silas, being a gentleman of leisure, approves wholeheartedly.

  • Contact
  • Cookies
  • Privacy

Copyright © 2026 · Agency Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in